Comparisons
Marketing comparisons, with a recommendation
Side-by-side breakdowns of the decisions businesses ask about most — each with a clear verdict so you can decide instead of guessing.
Comparison
Google Ads vs Meta Ads for ecommerce
Choose Google Ads when demand already exists (people are searching for what you sell). Choose Meta Ads when you need to create demand and reach people by interest and behaviour.
| Factor | Google Ads / PMax | Meta Ads / Shopping |
|---|---|---|
| Intent | High — active search demand | Lower — interruption/discovery |
| Best for | Capturing ready buyers | Building demand & retargeting |
| Creative load | Lower (text + shopping feed) | Higher (video & static creative) |
| Speed to signal | Fast for high-intent keywords | Needs creative testing to scale |
| Typical role | Bottom-of-funnel conversion | Top & mid-funnel + retargeting |
Comparison
Performance Max vs Standard Shopping
Choose Standard Shopping when you want granular control over product groups, negative keywords, and bids. Choose Performance Max when you want maximum reach and have strong feed + conversion data to feed the AI.
| Factor | Google Ads / PMax | Meta Ads / Shopping |
|---|---|---|
| Reach | All Google inventory (Search, Shopping, YouTube, Display, Gmail) | Shopping tab + search partners only |
| Control | Limited / opaque | Granular (product groups, bids) |
| Setup effort | Higher (assets, feed, audience signals) | Lower (feed + bids) |
| Data requirement | Needs solid conversion volume | Works with less data |
| Best for | Scale once tracking & feed are strong | Control & diagnostics early on |
Comparison
Agency vs freelancer vs in-house
Choose in-house when you need deep brand immersion and can hire a full team. Choose a freelancer for a single, well-defined channel. Choose an agency when you need breadth, systems, and faster execution than hiring allows.
| Factor | Agency | Freelancer | In-house |
|---|---|---|---|
| Breadth of skills | Wide (paid, SEO, CRO, tracking, automation) | Deep in one area | Depends on hires |
| Speed to start | Fast — team ready now | Fast for one channel | Slow (recruiting + ramp) |
| Cost efficiency | Predictable retainer, shared overhead | Lowest direct cost | Highest (salaries + tools) |
| Coverage gaps | Rare — multi-disciplinary | Common outside their skill | Risk while roles unfilled |
| Best for | Growing businesses needing systems | Single-channel execution | Mature brands with budget |
Not sure which fits you?
We will map the right mix for your business.
Book a free audit and we will recommend the channels and setup that match your goals and budget.